Research related to Irlen Syndrome

Research related to Irlen Syndrome has been published in many respected journals.

This web site contains two summaries of research: 

Summary from the Australasian Association of Irlen Consultants for the 2002 International Irlen Conference, below. 

Summary by researcher Greg Robinson from Newcastle University, New South Wales, Australia.  click here

Also see web sites of these researchers:

Dr. Greg Robinson, from the Special Education Centre at Newcastle University, New South Wales, Australia.
http://www.newcastle.edu.au/centre/sed/irlen/papers.html

Professor Arnold Wilkins, formerly with the MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, UK;
now at the University of Essex, UK  http://www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/overlays/index.htm
His forthcoming book (April, 2003, John Wiley Publ.), Reading Through Colour: How Coloured Filters Reduce Reading Difficulty, Eye-strain and Headaches, is available in pdf format at: 
www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/overlays/book2.pdf  4Mb download.

See this annotated bibliography on Irlen Syndrome, courtesy of Irlen Center Northwest, UK.

A summary of Irlen research from the Australasian Association of Irlen Consultants notes:

In a recent survey, it was possible to identify 56 studies involving coloured overlays, coloured computer monitors or coloured lenses. Many of these would be considered to have adequate experimental controls and many were published in peer reviewed journals, with editors who are conscious of guarding the reputation of their journal by not accepting papers with serious methodological flaws. Of the 56 studies reviewed, only 6 produced fully negative results, with 35 finding positive results for particular reading skills, 4 having mixed results and 11 finding improvements in accommodation facility, eye movements while reading, and reduced headaches/migraine.

__________________________

    (reprinted with permission)

AUSTRALASIAN ASSOCIATION OF IRLEN CONSULTANTS INC.

PRESIDENT: Dr. G. Robinson. Special Education Centre, University of Newcastle , Callaghan NSW 2308. Ph: 02 4921 6291.

VICE PRESIDENT: (Dr.) Paul R. Whiting PhD. Mobile : 0416 26 36 24.

BASIC RESEARCH INTO THE IRLEN METHOD

August 2001

The Irlen method is another way of looking at a subset of individuals who, in reality may not be dyslexic nor ADHD, nor have specific learning disabilities, but who may manifest symptoms similar to those displayed by individuals with those disorders. These individuals may or may not have fundamental difficulties in language processing at the level of the phoneme, but they do have difficulty with a subset of perceptual and processing skills that prevent the easy and efficient use of reading skills, thus interfering overall with learning and attention. When incidence data has been collected on this type of processing deficit, it consistently appears as one layer of difficulty in at least 46% of those identified with reading, attention or learning difficulties. It may not be the only difficulty or major problem, but reducing or eliminating this layer can be very beneficial to the educational process of the individual, allowing them to benefit more from other programs or therapies, and reducing their overall level of difficulty.

Diagnosis and treatment with Irlen Filters has been reviewed by the USA Medical Board, and has been determined as not the practice of medicine, and has also been reviewed by various USA Boards of Optometry and been found to be not the practice of optometry. The problem is not a medical condition. It is not pathological, nor a disease. It is not, as far as is known, a visual problem due to any abnormality of the eye. As a perceptual problem, it is similar to other processing problems (visual and auditory) which are diagnosed by psycho-educational testing and treated within the educational system.

In USA , there are over 4,000 schools that have implemented the Irlen method. Over 80,000 people have been provided with Irlen Filters; Arizona has passed a bill designating funding for a pilot project and within two years making Irlen screening mandatory in all schools in that state; California has funded a pilot project for the diagnosis and treatment of inmates at Mule Creek Prison, and Alabama has recognised Scotopic Sensitivity as a learning disability. In the United Kingdom , the Medical Research Council has funded extensive research into the Irlen method and coloured filters at Cambridge University and now at Essex University .

Research projects are ongoing around the world, and I have attached a selection for your perusal. Some of these concern Irlen filters, others are investigating the principle of colour filtering. In a recent survey, it was possible to identify 56 studies involving coloured overlays, coloured computer monitors or coloured lenses. Many of these would be considered to have adequate experimental controls and many were published in peer reviewed journals, with editors who are conscious of guarding the reputation of their journal by not accepting papers with serious methodological flaws. Of the 56 studies reviewed, only 6 produced fully negative results, with 35 finding positive results for particular reading skills, 4 having mixed results and 11 finding improvements in accommodation facility, eye movements while reading, and reduced headaches/migraine.

In Australia , Dr. G. Robinson from the Special Education Centre at Newcastle University has just completed the first placebo-controlled study of the use of Irlen Filters, and has published numerous other papers on the subject, including evidence of biochemical anomalies in people with Irlen Syndrome. Fundamental research is being conducted by Dr. Jeff Lewine, Associate Professor of Radiology and Director of Functional Brain Imaging, University of Utah , and Professor G. Barbolini, Universita Degli Studi Di Modena, Dipartimento Di Scienze Morfologiche E Medico, Italy . Brain research at the cellular level has provided new information regarding the operation of the visual pathways in dyslexics as opposed to normal readers, and provides a plausible explanation for the demonstrated effectiveness of Irlen filters whether in the form of lenses or acetate sheets. A single-subject study carried out in the US Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division purports to demonstrate, among other things, that the Irlen effect is real, and that varying the energy spectrum presented to the eye of this dyslexic individual was capable of altering visual and cognitive performance for better or worse, to a significant extent.

In the light of the ongoing research and the results of clinical surveys, it seems important that this technology be widely available to individuals who suffer with learning disabilities, whose disabilities are not easily resolved by other methods, or for whom Irlen Syndrome may constitute one layer of the disability. While it does not assist all people with learning disabilities, it constitutes a relatively cheap, non-invasive and safe intervention that appears materially to assist a significant number of people with learning disabilities.

SYNOPSIS OF SOME RESEARCH PAPERS

August 2002

In the United Kingdom , the main researchers have been Professor Arnold Wilkins of the MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge , and Dr. Bruce Evans of the Institute of Optometry , London . While Arnold Wilkins is partly commercially involved with a colour diagnostic method, neither of the above researchers prescribes Irlen lenses.

A study by Wilkins et al. (1994) used a double masked, placebo controlled design with subjects reporting significantly fewer symptoms when the correct coloured lenses were worn. The Wilkins et al. (1996) study found an immediate and significant increase in reading speed when using coloured overlays.

Evans et al. (1995) investigated the degree to which subjects with symptoms of Scotopic Sensitivity/Irlen Syndrome have undetected optometric problems. It was found their difficulties were primarily of a non-optometric nature and thus do not come within the field of optometry.

The Tyrrell, Holland , Dennis, and Wilkins (1995) study found children read significantly more slowly without a chosen coloured overlay than with it. These effects took 10 minutes of reading time to occur, which verifies the claims of a progressive distortion of print frequently reported by subjects. A later study demonstrated that improved speed of reading could not be attributed to placebo effects nor to optometric or orthoptic factors (Bouldoukian, Wilkins & Evans, 2002).

Another group of researchers centre on Florida with Mary Williams as a key person. This group of researchers does not have any commercial involvement in the use of colour, and have worked independently with colour, having no association with the Irlen technique. The attached study by Williams et al. (1992) found significant improvements in reading comprehension and reading accuracy when using coloured overlays and coloured computer monitors.

A third group of researchers centre on the University of New South Wales . They also have worked independently from Irlen and do not have a commercial involvement in the use of colour. The main researchers are Robert Elliott, Professor in the Education Faculty and Stephen Dain, Associate Professor in the Faculty of Optometry.

Other researchers at the University of New South Wales (Croyle, 1998) have found a significant improvement in a speeded classification task under certain coloured background conditions, which supports the concept of a deficit in the transient visual processing system as outlined in the Williams et al. (1992) article. If the deficit is identified as a visual-perceptual or visual processing problem, it does not lie within the field of optometry.

Our clinical research in Sydney (Whiting et al., 1994) has shown that individuals wearing Irlen lenses for six years indicate continuing improvements in a range of symptoms, from poor reading comprehension to headache.

Dr. Greg Robinson from Newcastle University is involved in dispensing Irlen lenses, but his research has been published in peer review journals that are conscious of the need for research to be methodologically sound.

A first paper (Robinson & Conway, 1994) found significant improvements in reading comprehension and rate of reading for a group of subjects using Irlen lenses when compared to a control group. Both groups had a similar degree of reading difficulty.

A second paper (Robinson, Foreman, & Dear, 1996) investigated the familial incidence of symptoms of Scotopic Sensitivity/Irlen Syndrome. It was found that for children who have symptoms, there was an 84% chance of at least one parent showing similar symptoms.

A third paper (Robinson, 1994) is a review of current evidence to that date, with the methodological flaws of both positive and negative studies discussed. The review should provide you a good overview of the range of research undertaken. The literature review in the Robinson, Foreman and Dear (1996) study would provide a more recent supplement to this.

A long-term placebo controlled double masked crossover study that was funded by the Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health has found three year gains in comprehension and two year gains in accuracy over the 20 months study period for 3 experimental groups, compared to a one year gain for the control group. (Perceptual and Motor Skills, March, 1999). Robinson has also found significant gains in comprehension and accuracy over a six-month period in a recent study that involved an experimental group and two control groups, one not using Irlen filters, and one whose application of Irlen filters was delayed three months. The comprehension and accuracy effects tended to plateau after three months, however. Self-esteem was also measured and improved significantly (Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, (2000), 5(1), 4-13.)

I do not feel that it is appropriate, in the important area of literacy, to conduct a numbers war with the side having the greatest number of positive studies being declared the winner and the losing side having its research dismissed (as is constantly occurring in the debate about methods of teaching reading). In the interests of balance, I have provided a list of studies showing negative results, so that readers may judge, to some extent, for themselves, the merits of the case. However, I do think that the case for Irlen lenses has not been fairly stated, and I have provided the above information in an attempt to rebalance the situation. In particular, I was concerned that among the many emerging methods, Irlen has been one of the few identified for negative comment, especially as there are many other areas that do not have the wide research support that this method is now receiving.

Regarding the probable anatomical mechanisms involved in the studies, the papers by Livingstone et al., (1991) and Lehmkuhle et al. (1993) appear to demonstrate the existence of a defective visual pathway in at least some dyslexic individuals, while the report from Lewine et al. from New Mexico (now Utah) indicates that a positive effect on neural organization can be observed in individuals wearing Irlen lenses when subject to magnetic source imaging.

This study at the University of Utah Centre for Advanced Medical Technologies (submitted for publication) has resulted in the following observations, among others:

"This study provides objective physiological evidence for a neurological correlate (and perhaps basis) of scotopic sensitivity syndrome. Specifically, subjects with SSS demonstrate disordered visual information processing when compared to control subjects." And again,

"Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the present study is the objective evidence for a physiological effect of Irlen lenses. The slowing of the early component of the evoked response probably reflects little more than the fact that the lenses reduce the luminance by a factor of 1.5-3 (depending on the particular set of lenses). The effect at 180 msec cannot be explained easily in the same manner. Rather, the data suggest a true alteration in visual information processing by the Irlen lenses. Interestingly, this effect does not seem to influence the 220 msec component. This suggests that the 180 and 220 msec response components reflect parallel rather than sequential processing. . . . by providing objective evidence for the effect of lenses, it can now be reasonably argued that anecdotal reports of the effectiveness of Irlen lenses should not be dismissed out of hand."

(Dr.) Paul R. Whiting

Vice President

Tel: 0416 263624

IRLEN RESEARCH SUMMARY REFERENCES

Bouldoukian, J., Wilkins, A.J., & Evans, B.J.W. (2002). Randomised controlled trial of the effect of coloured overlays on the rate of reading of people with specific learning difficulties. Ophthalmological and Physiological Optics, 22, pp. 55-60 .

Croyle, L. (1998). Rate of reading, visual processing, colour and contrast. Australian Journal of learning Disabilities, 3(3), pp. 13-21.

Evans, B.J.W., Busby, A., Jeanes, R., & Wilkins, A.J. (1995).  Optometric correlates of Meares-Irlen syndrome: A matched group study. Ophthalmological and Physiological Optics, 15(5), pp. 481-487.

Irvine , J.H. & Irvine, E.W. (1997).  Scotopic sensitivity syndrome in a single individual (A case study). China Lake , CA 93555-6001: Naval Air Warfare Weapons Division.

Jordan , D.R. (1972). Dyslexia in the Classroom. Chicago , Bell and Howell. Also in Overcoming Dyslexia, Pro Ed, 1989.

Lehmkuhle, S., Garzia, R,P., Turner, L., Hash, T., & Baro, J.A. (1993). A defective visual pathway in children with reading disability. New England Journal of Medicine, 328(14) 989-996.

Livingstone, M.S., Rosen, G.D., Drislane, F.W., & Galaburda, A.M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 88, pp. 7943-7947.

Lovegrove, W. (1984). Dyslexia and the vision factor. Education News, November, 15-18.

Meares, O. (1980). Figure/ground brightness contrast, and reading disabilities. Visible Language, XIV, 1, 13-29.

Robinson, G.L. & Conway, R.N.F. (1994). Irlen filters and reading strategies: Effect of coloured filters on reading achievement, specific reading strategies and perception of ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 467-483.

Robinson, G.L. & Conway, R.N.F. (2000). Irlen lenses and adults: A small-scale study of reading speed, accuracy, comprehension and self-image. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5(1), pp. 4-13.

Robinson, G.L. (1994). Coloured lenses and reading: A review of research into reading achievement, reading strategies and causal mechanisms. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 18, 3-14.

Robinson, G.L.W & Conway, R.N.F. (1990). The effects of Irlen coloured lenses on students’ specific reading skills and their perception of ability: a 12-month validity study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 10, 589-596.

Tyrrell, R., Holland , K., Dennis, D., & Wilkins, A. (1995). Coloured overlays, visual discomfort, visual search and classroom reading. Research in Reading , 18, 10-23.

Whiting, P., Robinson, G.L., & Parrot, C.F. (1994). Irlen coloured filters for reading: A six year follow up. Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 26(3), 13-19.

Whiting, P.R. & Robinson, G.L.W. (1988). Using Irlen coloured lenses for reading. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist. 5, 2, 7-10.

Whiting, P.R. (1988). Improvements in reading and other skills using Irlen coloured lenses. Australian Journal of Remedial Education. 20, 1, 13-15.

Wilkins, A.J., Evans, B.J.W., Brown, J.A., Busby, A.E., Wingfield, A.E., Jeans, R.J., & Bald, J. (1994). Double-masked placebo-controlled trial of precision spectral filters in children who use coloured overlays. Ophthalmological and Physiological Optics, 14, 365-370.

Wilkins, A.J., Jeans, R.J., Pumfrey, P.D., & Laskier, M. (1996). Rate of reading test: Its reliability and its validity in the assessment of the effects of coloured overlays. Ophthalmological and Physiological Optics, 16(6), 491-497.

Williams, M.C., Lecluyse K., & Rock-Faucheux, A. (1992). Effective interventions for reading disability.  Journal of the American Optometric Association. 63, 6, 411-416.

b. Negative

Cardinal, D.N., Griffin , J.R., & Christensen, G.N. (1993). Do tinted lenses really help students with reading disabilities? Intervention in School and Clinic, 28(5) 275-279.

Cotton, M.M. & Evans, K.M. (1990). An evaluation of the Irlen lenses as a treatment for specific reading disorders. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42(1) 1-12. (Greg Robinson replies to this article in the same issue: pp.13-15.)

Martin, F., Mackenzie, B., Lovegrove, W., & McNicol, D. (1993). Irlen lenses in the treatment of specific reading disability: An evaluation of outcomes and processes. Australian Journal of Psychology. 45(3), 141-150.

Menacker, S.J., Breton , M.E. , Breton, M.L., Radcliffe, J., Gole, G.A. (1993). Do tinted lenses improve the reading performance of dyslexic children? Archives of ophthalmology, 111, 213-

Rosner J., & Rosner, J., (1987), The Irlen treatment: A review of the literature. Optician, Sept. 26-33.

Saint-John, L.M. & White, M.A. (1988). The effect of coloured transparencies on the reading performance of reading-disabled children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40(4). 403-411.

SPELD ( S.A. ) Tinted Lenses Study Group (1989). Tinted lenses and dyslexics - a controlled study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology, 17(2), 137-141.

Stanley, G. (1990). Rose coloured spectacles: A cure for dyslexia? Australian Psychologist, 25(2) 65- .

Winter, S. (1987). Irlen lenses: An appraisal. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 4(2), 1-5.

  return to Irlen homepage